Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-13

Sukhdev Yadav And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3678
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sukhdev Yadav And Ors
Respondent
State Of Bihar
Bench
Umesh C Banerjee, N. Santosh Hegde

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reiterated that discrepancies in witness testimonies should not lead to the rejection of evidence unless they are materially significant. Citing Section 155 of the Evidence Act, the Court emphasized that not all inconsistencies impair a witness's credibility, and minor variations should not obliterate otherwise acceptable evidence. The judgment clarifies that the credibility of a witness can only be impeached if the inconsistencies are substantial enough to discredit their testimony.

Sukhdev Yadav And Ors vs State Of Bihar · Niyam