Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-04

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Tarsem Singh And Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3431
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Himachal Pradesh
Respondent
Tarsem Singh And Others
Author
V. N. Khare
Bench
V.N.Khare, B.N.Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 3 of the Himachal Pradesh Village Common Lands Vesting and Utilization Act, 1974, only the rights, title, and interests in the land vested in the State, while the easementary rights of the village community for grazing and other common purposes were not extinguished. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the State has no authority to interfere with the community's easementary rights, thereby upholding the trial court's decree in favor of the respondents. The judgment clarifies the distinction between 'right in the land' and 'right over the land'.

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Tarsem Singh And Others · Niyam