Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-10

S. Pitchai Ganapathy And Ors. vs Commissioner, Hindu Religious And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2875
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. Pitchai Ganapathy And Ors.
Respondent
Commissioner, Hindu Religious And ...
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the temples of Madurai Veerasami and 18 Padi Karupannasami are 'public temples' belonging to the second respondent, Meenakshi Sundereswarar Temple, under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, specifically citing Section 63(a) and Section 69. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellants failed to establish their claim of the temples being 'private temples' due to lack of proper notice and merit. Consequently, the Letters Patent Appeal No. 206 of 1992 was dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling.

S. Pitchai Ganapathy And Ors. vs Commissioner, Hindu Religious And ... · Niyam