Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-19

STATE OF BIHAR vs BAIDNATH PRASAD @ BAIDYANATH SHAH

Citation / case number
SC 2001/3038
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF BIHAR
Respondent
BAIDNATH PRASAD @ BAIDYANATH SHAH
Author
S.N.VARIAVA K.T.THOMAS
Bench
S.N.VARIAVA K.T.THOMAS

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the quashing of criminal proceedings under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, was improper as the delay in the trial was not solely attributable to the prosecution. The Court emphasized that the accused had contributed to the delay and thus could not benefit from it. The judgment of the Patna High Court was set aside, reinstating the criminal proceedings against the accused, thereby affirming the importance of timely justice under Section 3 of the RPUP Act.

STATE OF BIHAR vs BAIDNATH PRASAD @ BAIDYANATH SHAH · Niyam