Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-08

KRIPA RAM MATHUR vs STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1999/10594
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRIPA RAM MATHUR
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.
Author
R.P. SETHI M.B. SHAH
Bench
R.P. SETHI M.B. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Rule 7(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad-hoc appointments (on posts within the purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, in the context of seniority disputes between the appellant and respondent No.4, both appointed as Lecturers in Pathology. The Court held that the seniority must be determined based on merit as assessed by the Selection Committee during the appointment process. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to quash the earlier order that had favored the appellant's seniority.

KRIPA RAM MATHUR vs STATE OF U.P. · Niyam