Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-19

State Of Bihar vs Baidnath Prasad @ Baidyanath Shah And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 64
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Bihar
Respondent
Baidnath Prasad @ Baidyanath Shah And ...
Bench
K.T.Thomas, S.N.Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the quashing of criminal proceedings under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, was improper as the delay in trial was not solely attributable to the accused. The Court emphasized that while the prolonged delay in the judicial process is concerning, the accused cannot benefit from the delay caused by their own actions and the judicial system. The Court overturned the Patna High Court's decision, reinstating the criminal proceedings against the accused, thereby affirming the need for timely justice under the law.

State Of Bihar vs Baidnath Prasad @ Baidyanath Shah And ... · Niyam