Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-08

Dr.Kirpa Ram Mathur vs State Of U.P. & Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3071
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dr.Kirpa Ram Mathur
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Others
Bench
M.B. Shah, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Rule 7(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad-hoc appointments (on posts within the purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, in the context of seniority disputes between the appellant and respondent No.4, both appointed as Lecturers in Pathology. The Court held that the seniority must be determined based on merit as assessed by the Selection Committee at the time of appointment, emphasizing the importance of the chronological order of appointment letters. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision that the seniority was to be re-evaluated according to the Rules.

Dr.Kirpa Ram Mathur vs State Of U.P. & Others · Niyam