Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-15

Union Of India And Ors. vs Supreme Steels & General Mills And Ors.

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2987
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India And Ors.
Respondent
Supreme Steels & General Mills And Ors.
Author
Brijesh Kumar
Bench
S.P. Bharucha, Brijesh Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 96ZO of the Central Excise Rules, determining that excise duty should be assessed based on actual production for the entire financial year. The Court upheld the provision that manufacturers opting for a fixed payment under Rule 96ZO cannot claim benefits under Section 3A(4) simultaneously. The judgment clarified that the manufacturers' challenge to the rule was unfounded, affirming the legality of the provisions as they stand.

Union Of India And Ors. vs Supreme Steels & General Mills And Ors. · Niyam