Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-10-10

Rajpal vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

Citation / case number
[2002(92)FLR769]
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajpal
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra And Anr.
Author
S. Rajendra Babu and Doraiswamy Raju
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the rejection of the appellant's application for regular appointment as a canal patwari was unjustified, as he possessed a valid 10+2 qualification from the Haryana Education Board, despite earlier qualifications from an unrecognized institution. The Court emphasized that the High Court should have allowed the writ petition instead of dismissing it. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and directed the Service Selection Board to reconsider the appellant's application based on his valid qualifications.

Rajpal vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. · Niyam