Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-11-07

Chandrika Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr vs Umesh Kumar Verma & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 108
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chandrika Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr
Respondent
Umesh Kumar Verma & Ors
Bench
R.P. Sethi, S.N. Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982, the High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court's finding regarding the landlords' bonafide requirement for eviction under Section 11(1)(c). The Court emphasized that the High Court's re-appreciation of evidence was impermissible, as the landlords had established a genuine need for the premises for their son-in-law's clinic. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and upheld the eviction order of the Trial Court.

Chandrika Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr vs Umesh Kumar Verma & Ors · Niyam