Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-05-04

M.D., Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs Neethivilangan, Kumbakonam

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2309
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.D., Tamil Nadu State Transport ...
Respondent
Neethivilangan, Kumbakonam
Author
D.P.Mohapatra
Bench
D.P. Mohapatra, Shivaraj V. Patil

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, if an employer's application for approval of dismissal is rejected by the Tribunal, the workman is entitled to reinstatement and back wages. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the respondent, who was dismissed without approval, is deemed to have been in continuous service since the date of dismissal and entitled to all benefits. The appeal by the employer was dismissed, reinforcing the legal principle that a workman cannot be left without remedy after an unsuccessful dismissal approval application.

M.D., Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs Neethivilangan, Kumbakonam · Niyam