RATHI MENON vs UNION OF INDIA

The Supreme Court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of six lakhs to Rathi Menon for her injuries was justified, emphasizing that the compensation should reflect the severity of her condition as a paraplegic and the loss of limbs. The Court found that the High Court's reduction of the compensation amount was unwarranted and contrary to the principles of justice, particularly given the circumstances of the case. The Court reinstated the original award and upheld the interest rate of 15% per annum from the date of default, ensuring that the victim received adequate compensation for her suffering under the Railways Act.