Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-03-16

SEELAN RAJ vs P.O.,IST ADDL.LABOUR COURT,CHENNAI &ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1998/2105
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SEELAN RAJ
Respondent
P.O.,IST ADDL.LABOUR COURT,CHENNAI &ORS.
Bench
S. RAJENDRA BABU & Y.K. SABHARWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the closure of a data processing division under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically citing Section 25FFA and Section 25-O. The Court held that the establishment qualified as a factory under Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948, and thus the closure was unjustified as it did not comply with the statutory requirements for closure. The Court reinstated the workmen with back wages, affirming the Labour Court's decision against the respondent company's claims.

SEELAN RAJ vs P.O.,IST ADDL.LABOUR COURT,CHENNAI &ORS. · Niyam