Anil K. Sharma vs State Insurance & Gpf Deptt. And Anr.

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, who was initially appointed on a daily wage basis and later terminated, was entitled to the benefits of the amended provisions of Sub-rule (10) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Recruitment Rules, as he had been working in that capacity during the relevant period. The Court emphasized that the non-consideration of the appellant for re-appointment violated Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, leading to the conclusion that he should be treated equally with others appointed on the same date. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant the appellant the same benefits as his peers, reinforcing the principle of equal treatment in employment under the amended rules.