Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-07-25

DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR vs ATUL KUMAR SHARMA

Citation / case number
SC 2001/1932
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR
Respondent
ATUL KUMAR SHARMA
Author
RAJENDRA BABU
Bench
S.RAJENDRA BABU & SHIVARAJ V. PATIL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow a supplementary examination for the post of Administrative Officer or Court Master, emphasizing that the respondent was not given adequate time to prepare for the examination. The Court noted that the High Court's earlier ruling in C.W.P.No. 1218/89 did not preclude the filing of a supplementary application, as it was merely a continuation of the relief sought. The Court distinguished the precedent set in State of U.P. vs. Brahm Datt Sharma, affirming that the respondent was pursuing previously granted relief rather than a new cause of action.

DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR vs ATUL KUMAR SHARMA · Niyam