Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-07-09

HARMOHINDER SINGH vs KHARGA CANTEEN, AMBALA CANTT.

Citation / case number
SC 1999/16403
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARMOHINDER SINGH
Respondent
KHARGA CANTEEN, AMBALA CANTT.
Author
RUMA PAL D.P. MOHAPATRA
Bench
RUMA PAL D.P. MOHAPATRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of an employee's service under the Standing Orders introduced after the employee's appointment is valid, provided the employee accepted those terms. The Court found that the provisions of para 3A of the Standing Orders, which set a maximum age limit and service duration, were binding on the appellant and did not violate Sections 9A, 25J, and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Labour Court's decision that the termination was justified.

HARMOHINDER SINGH vs KHARGA CANTEEN, AMBALA CANTT. · Niyam