Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-07-17

Uniplas India Ltd. And Ors vs State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2625
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Uniplas India Ltd. And Ors
Respondent
State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) And Anr
Author
K.T. Thomas
Bench
K.T. Thomas

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a notice under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act cannot be considered a valid notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court emphasized that the statutory requirements for a notice under Section 138 must be strictly adhered to, and the complaint filed within the prescribed period was valid. Consequently, the appeal by the appellants was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions regarding the cognizance of the offence under Section 138 NI Act.

Uniplas India Ltd. And Ors vs State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) And Anr · Niyam