Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-07-25

Board Of Directors, Represented vs Director, National Aluminium

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Board Of Directors, Represented
Respondent
Director, National Aluminium
Author
Shivaraj V. Patil
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Shivaraj V. Patil

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the introduction of the E-O grade in the executive cadre, which was challenged by employees in the S-3 supervisory cadre. The Court held that the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for Executives, 1984, were applicable only to executives and not to non-executive employees, thus validating the circular No. 64 issued for creating promotional avenues for S-3 grade employees. The Court emphasized that the binding settlement under Section 18(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, allowed for internal selection for E-O level posts, affirming the legality of the promotional scheme.

Board Of Directors, Represented vs Director, National Aluminium · Niyam