Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-01-17

AYYAPPALLY MOHAMMED HAJI vs M.M. ABDULSALAM .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/3687
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AYYAPPALLY MOHAMMED HAJI
Respondent
M.M. ABDULSALAM .
Bench
S.R.BABU, S.N.VARIAVA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's suit without allowing the amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court emphasized that the proper course was to remand the case for a fresh hearing on merits based on the existing pleadings. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside, remanding the case to the Subordinate Judge for a decision afresh.

AYYAPPALLY MOHAMMED HAJI vs M.M. ABDULSALAM . · Niyam