Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-02-07

GAYA PRASAD vs PRADEEP SRIVASTAVA

Citation / case number
SC 2000/15894
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GAYA PRASAD
Respondent
PRADEEP SRIVASTAVA
Author
DORAISWAMY RAJU. K.T. THOMAS
Bench
DORAISWAMY RAJU. K.T. THOMAS

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the prolonged litigation under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of eviction cases. The Court held that the delay in the landlord's need for eviction, which was initially deemed bona fide, was exacerbated by the tenant's prolonged legal maneuvers, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the tenant's appeal. The Court underscored the importance of expediting judicial processes to prevent undue hardship to landlords seeking to reclaim their properties for legitimate purposes.

GAYA PRASAD vs PRADEEP SRIVASTAVA · Niyam