SEETA HEMCHANDRA SASHITTAL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of prolonged delay in criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, specifically citing Section 5(2) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court emphasized the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, holding that excessive delays can lead to the quashing of charges. The Court ultimately ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing their plea to dismiss the criminal proceedings due to the inordinate delay in the investigation and trial process.