Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-12-04

Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors vs Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 296
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors
Respondent
Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors
Bench
S.S.M. Quadri, U. C. Banerjee, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether a Bench of two Judges can disagree with a judgment of three Judges and refer the matter to a larger Bench. Citing Article 145(2) and (3) of the Constitution, the Court held that a two-Judge Bench must follow the precedent set by a three-Judge Bench unless it is overruled or deemed per incuriam. The Court clarified that the proper procedure is to refer the matter to a three-Judge Bench rather than directly to a five-Judge Bench, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and hierarchy in the judicial system.

Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors vs Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors · Niyam