Supreme Court of India · 2001-12-04
Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors vs Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors
- Citation / case number
- AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 296
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors
- Respondent
- Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors
- Bench
- S.S.M. Quadri, U. C. Banerjee, S.N. Variava
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed whether a Bench of two Judges can disagree with a judgment of three Judges and refer the matter to a larger Bench. Citing Article 145(2) and (3) of the Constitution, the Court held that a two-Judge Bench must follow the precedent set by a three-Judge Bench unless it is overruled or deemed per incuriam. The Court clarified that the proper procedure is to refer the matter to a three-Judge Bench rather than directly to a five-Judge Bench, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and hierarchy in the judicial system.