Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-12-04

State Of Maharashtra vs Mrs. Bharati Chandmal Varma @ Ayesha ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 285
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mrs. Bharati Chandmal Varma @ Ayesha ...
Bench
K.T. Thomas, S.N. Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the 90-day period for filing a charge sheet under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to be calculated from the date of the arrest, which in this case was 2.4.2001. The Court clarified that since the charge sheet was not filed within this period, the respondent, Ayesha Khan, was entitled to bail. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant bail, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines in criminal proceedings.

State Of Maharashtra vs Mrs. Bharati Chandmal Varma @ Ayesha ... · Niyam