Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-08-30

S.A.I.L. vs NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS&ORS

Citation / case number
SC 1998/11813
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.A.I.L.
Respondent
NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS&ORS
Author
B.N. KIRPAL,SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI,M.B. SHAH,RUMA PAL,K. G. BALAKRISHNAN
Bench
B.N. KIRPAL,SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI,M.B. SHAH,RUMA PAL,K. G. BALAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'appropriate Government' under Section 2(1)(a) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, emphasizing the automatic absorption of contract labor following an abolition notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act. The Court held that the conflict of opinions among different benches necessitated a referral to a larger bench for resolution. Consequently, the cases were tagged for collective adjudication, affirming the need for clarity on the legal implications of the prohibition notification issued by the Government of West Bengal.

S.A.I.L. vs NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS&ORS · Niyam