Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-08-28

J. R. Parashar, Advocate & Ors vs Prasant Bhushan, Advocate & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3395
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
J. R. Parashar, Advocate & Ors
Respondent
Prasant Bhushan, Advocate & Ors
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a contempt application concerning a dharna held on December 30, 2000, where respondents allegedly shouted abusive slogans against the Court and assaulted the petitioners. The Court noted that while the respondents admitted to the dharna, they denied any wrongdoing, asserting their right to protest against the Court's judgment on the Narmada dam. The Court emphasized the balance between the right to protest and the integrity of the judiciary, ultimately holding that criticism of the judiciary must be constructive and not contemptuous, thereby dismissing the contempt application.

J. R. Parashar, Advocate & Ors vs Prasant Bhushan, Advocate & Ors · Niyam