Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-08-14

M.S.V. Raja & Anr vs Seeni Thevar & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3389
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.S.V. Raja & Anr
Respondent
Seeni Thevar & Ors
Author
Shivaraj V. Patil
Bench
S.V.Patil, S.R.Babu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the High Court affirming that the Arulighu Mariamman temple is a denominational temple under Article 26 of the Constitution, belonging to the Rajus community. The Court ruled that the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department's actions to appoint additional trustees violated the community's rights, as established under Section 63(b) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Act, 1959. The appeal by the defendants was dismissed, maintaining the lower courts' decisions that recognized the Rajus' rights over the temple administration.

M.S.V. Raja & Anr vs Seeni Thevar & Ors · Niyam