Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-08-06

Anil Rai vs State Of Bihar

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3173
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anil Rai
Respondent
State Of Bihar
Author
K.T. Thomas
Bench
K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the critical importance of timely judgment delivery, highlighting the detrimental effects of delays on justice, particularly in criminal cases where individuals remain incarcerated. The Court referenced the Patna High Court's previous admonitions regarding delays, underscoring that such procrastination undermines the judicial process. The judgment serves as a reminder that the Constitution does not provide mechanisms to address delays by High Court judges, thus necessitating self-regulation and accountability among them.

Anil Rai vs State Of Bihar · Niyam