Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-08-03

N. Kamalam (Dead) And Anr vs Ayyasamy & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2802
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N. Kamalam (Dead) And Anr
Respondent
Ayyasamy & Anr
Bench
A.P. Misra, Umesh C. Banerjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the principles of testamentary jurisdiction, emphasizing that the onus probandi lies on the party propounding a will, as established in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act. The Court reiterated that attestation requires the intent to attest (animo attestandi), meaning witnesses must sign with the purpose of confirming the execution of the will. The judgment distinguished previous cases, confirming that individuals signing for purposes other than attestation do not qualify as attesting witnesses, thereby upholding the legal standards for valid will execution.

N. Kamalam (Dead) And Anr vs Ayyasamy & Anr · Niyam