Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-04-30

Narendra Kumar And Ors. vs Management Of Taj Services Ltd. And Anr.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2001 SC 454
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Narendra Kumar And Ors.
Respondent
Management Of Taj Services Ltd. And Anr.
Bench
G.B. Patnaik, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, ruling that a workman is not required to file an affidavit each month to prove non-employment to receive benefits under this section. The Court held that once the affidavit is filed and the court is satisfied, the employer must pay full wages during the pendency of proceedings unless proven otherwise. The High Court's restriction of benefits to the period until the affidavit was deemed unjustified, affirming the legislative intent of Section 17B.

Narendra Kumar And Ors. vs Management Of Taj Services Ltd. And Anr. · Niyam