Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-04-26

Rambhau & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 2120
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rambhau & Anr
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Bench
Umesh C. Banerjee, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the application of Section 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing that additional evidence may be admitted only if it does not prejudice the accused and is necessary for justice. The Court held that the exercise of discretion under Section 391 must be cautious and not transform the appeal into a retrial, reaffirming that the doctrine of finality in judicial proceedings remains intact. The judgment overturned the High Court's conviction under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, highlighting the need for fair play and justice in the appellate process.

Rambhau & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam