Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-09-05

Laxmi Narain & Sons vs State Of Haryana And Ors.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 621
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Laxmi Narain & Sons
Respondent
State Of Haryana And Ors.
Bench
V.N. Khare, S.N. Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the amendment to the Schedule under Section 38 of the Act does not require adherence to the procedural requirements outlined in Sections 5 and 6. The Court clarified that while Sections 5 and 6 mandate public objections for declaring a notified market area, Section 38 allows for amendments to the Schedule without such procedural constraints. Consequently, the amendment was deemed valid, and the market committee was entitled to levy fees based on the amended Schedule.

Laxmi Narain & Sons vs State Of Haryana And Ors. · Niyam