Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-09-27

Shri Mahavir Prashad Gupta & Anr. vs State Of National Capital Territory Of ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 3101
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shri Mahavir Prashad Gupta & Anr.
Respondent
State Of National Capital Territory Of ...
Author
S.N. Variava
Bench
K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a Criminal Writ Petition seeking to quash an FIR for breach of trust and forgery, emphasizing that jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC must be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, as established in State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan (1988) and State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992). The Court noted that the Petitioners had not pursued available legal remedies after their anticipatory bail was denied, thus lacking justification for invoking Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court concluded that the Petitioners' actions had unnecessarily delayed the inquiry for over two and a half years.

Shri Mahavir Prashad Gupta & Anr. vs State Of National Capital Territory Of ... · Niyam