Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-09-28

Shivendra Kumar vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
2002 SCC (CRI) 564
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shivendra Kumar
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
D.P. Mohapatra
Bench
D.P. Mohapatra, R.P. Sethi

Judgment text excerpt

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of Dr. Singhal under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 to omit injuries in an autopsy report. The court found that the prosecution established the demand for illegal gratification and the appellant's defense of planting the money was unconvincing. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's sentence of six months' rigorous imprisonment and fines.

Shivendra Kumar vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam