Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-09-04

Life Convict Laxman Naskar vs State Of West Bengal & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Life Convict Laxman Naskar
Respondent
State Of West Bengal & Anr
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Shivaraj V. Patil

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that a life sentence does not automatically expire after 20 years, as established in Section 432 Cr.P.C. and Article 161 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that the appropriate Government has the discretion to remit sentences, and no writ can compel the release of a prisoner if remission is denied. The judgment clarified that imprisonment for life signifies the entire natural life of the convict unless remitted, aligning with precedents set in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ratan Singh and Naib Singh v. State of Punjab.

Life Convict Laxman Naskar vs State Of West Bengal & Anr · Niyam