Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-09-25

Rhone-Poinenc (India) Ltd. vs State Of U.P. & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rhone-Poinenc (India) Ltd.
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Ors
Author
S. Rajendra Babu
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court's decision that the termination of respondent no.3, a Medical Representative, was improper and illegal under the Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court found that the enquiry conducted by the appellant was not in accordance with the principles of natural justice and that the transfer order was issued by an incompetent authority. The Court affirmed the Labour Court's ruling for reinstatement and consequential benefits, rejecting the appellant's claims regarding jurisdiction under Section 6(2) of the Sales Promotion Employees Act.

Rhone-Poinenc (India) Ltd. vs State Of U.P. & Ors · Niyam