Birla Corpn. Ltd. vs Rajeshwar Mahato And Ors.

The Supreme Court held that the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is crucial in determining the validity of termination. The Court found that the respondent, despite his designation, was primarily engaged in managerial and administrative duties, thus not qualifying as a workman. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the termination was valid and the Government Order of Reference was not maintainable.