Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-14

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LTD. vs AGRL.INCOME-TAX OFFICER,MADIKERI .

Citation / case number
SC 1999/19786
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LTD.
Respondent
AGRL.INCOME-TAX OFFICER,MADIKERI .
Author
Bharucha
Bench
D.P.MOHAPATRO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Sections 41 and 42 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1957, in relation to the imposition of penalties for non-payment of tax during the period of stay granted by the Appellate Authority. The Court held that the stay order does not exempt the assessee from penalty for the period after the stay was vacated and the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Division Bench's ruling that the assessee is liable for penalty during the intervening period. The judgment clarified the interpretation of default under the Act in the context of stay orders.

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LTD. vs AGRL.INCOME-TAX OFFICER,MADIKERI . · Niyam