Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-14

M/S.SUNIL INDS. vs RAM CHANDER PRADHAN

Citation / case number
SC 1997/18589
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S.SUNIL INDS.
Respondent
RAM CHANDER PRADHAN
Author
S.R.BABU S.N.VARIAVA
Bench
S.R.BABU S.N.VARIAVA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the applicability of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 to the appellant's establishment, affirming the Commissioner’s decision that the appellant was liable to pay compensation of Rs. 29,814/- along with a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- and interest at 12% per annum. The court clarified that the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(n) of the Act includes individuals employed in manufacturing processes as defined in the Factories Act, 1948. The appeal against the dismissal of the first appeal was rejected, confirming the lower court's ruling.

M/S.SUNIL INDS. vs RAM CHANDER PRADHAN · Niyam