Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-30

BOROSIL GLASS WORKS LTD EMPLOYEES UNION vs D.D. BAMBODE

Citation / case number
SC 1995/1441
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BOROSIL GLASS WORKS LTD EMPLOYEES UNION
Respondent
D.D. BAMBODE
Author
S.N.VARIAVA S.R.BABU
Bench
S.N.VARIAVA S.R.BABU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 28(1A) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, which pertains to disputes regarding membership and office-bearer status in trade unions. The Court held that only individuals who have been members for a minimum of six months can invoke the provisions of Section 28(1A) to refer disputes to the Industrial Court. The judgment of the Bombay High Court, which allowed a broader interpretation permitting non-members to apply, was overturned, affirming the necessity of prior membership for such applications.

BOROSIL GLASS WORKS LTD EMPLOYEES UNION vs D.D. BAMBODE · Niyam