Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-01

Food Corporation Of India, Hyderabad ... vs A. Prahalada Rao And Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 51
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Food Corporation Of India, Hyderabad ...
Respondent
A. Prahalada Rao And Another
Bench
M.B. Shah, D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Regulation 60 of the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971, emphasizing that when an employee disputes charges leading to a minor penalty, an inquiry must be conducted to ascertain the facts and the extent of any loss caused. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that failure to follow proper inquiry procedures renders the imposition of penalties invalid. Consequently, the order imposing a penalty on the employee was set aside, reinforcing the necessity of due process in disciplinary actions under the Regulations.

Food Corporation Of India, Hyderabad ... vs A. Prahalada Rao And Another · Niyam