Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-07

Abdul Karim Etc. Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Others Etc. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 116
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Abdul Karim Etc. Etc
Respondent
State Of Karnataka & Others Etc. Etc
Author
D.P. Mohapatra
Bench
D.P. Mohapatra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the kidnapping of film actor Rajkumar by Veerappan, emphasizing the failure of law enforcement to provide adequate protection despite prior warnings. The Court highlighted the responsibilities of the police under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, and held that the state has an obligation to ensure the safety of individuals, particularly when there is credible threat information. The Court concluded that the lack of timely action by the police constituted a violation of Rajkumar's rights, leading to the need for systemic reforms in police response protocols.

Abdul Karim Etc. Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Others Etc. Etc · Niyam