Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-11-14

M/S Consolidated Coffee Ltd vs The Agricultural Income-Tax Officer, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 3731
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Consolidated Coffee Ltd
Respondent
The Agricultural Income-Tax Officer, ...
Bench
D.P.MOHAPATRO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Karnataka High Court regarding the applicability of penalty under Section 42 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1957. The Court ruled that the stay of recovery granted by the Appellate Authority does not exempt the assessee from penalty for the period after the stay was vacated, as the provisions of Section 41 deem the assessee in default for non-payment. The Court confirmed that penalties can be levied for the period of non-compliance post-stay, affirming the High Court's interpretation of the statutory provisions.

M/S Consolidated Coffee Ltd vs The Agricultural Income-Tax Officer, ... · Niyam