Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-05-03

M/S. ESSAR CONSTRUCTIONS vs N.P. RAMA KRISHNA REDDY

Citation / case number
SC 1999/16659
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. ESSAR CONSTRUCTIONS
Respondent
N.P. RAMA KRISHNA REDDY
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
RUMA PAL D.P.WADHWA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the High Court of Andhra Pradesh correctly exercised its powers under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay in filing an application under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court held that the High Court improperly interfered with the Civil Judge's order dismissing the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it was not revisable under Section 115. The judgment clarified that an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act was the appropriate remedy, emphasizing the distinction between the powers of appellate courts and those under Section 115 of the CPC.

M/S. ESSAR CONSTRUCTIONS vs N.P. RAMA KRISHNA REDDY · Niyam