BALBIR KAUR vs STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. .

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of the Family Benefit Scheme under the NJSC Tripartite Agreement of 1989, determining that the introduction of this scheme does not negate the existing obligation for compassionate appointments as stipulated in clause 8.14.1 of the 1989 Agreement. The Court held that the requirement for compassionate appointments remains valid and cannot be disregarded, emphasizing the constitutional obligation towards an egalitarian society. The appeals were allowed, affirming the need for compassionate employment consideration for the dependents of deceased employees.