Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-05-03

RAM GOPAL vs DY.DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

Citation / case number
SC 1984/65101
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM GOPAL
Respondent
DY.DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION
Author
Rajendra Babu
Bench
S.R.Babu Doraiswami Raju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute over land ownership between Smt. Subhraji and the heirs of Smt. Bhagirathi, focusing on the status of Mukarrardar and Mafidar under the U.P. Tenancy Act, 1951. The Court held that a Mafidar is not a tenant, as per Section 4(5) of the North Western Province Tenancy Act, 1901, and that the appellate authority erred in recognizing the claim of the heirs of Bhagirathi as sub-tenants. The Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to correctly interpret the legal status of the parties involved based on the relevant tenancy laws.

RAM GOPAL vs DY.DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION · Niyam