Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-05-03

M/S Essar Constructions vs N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 553
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Essar Constructions
Respondent
N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
D.P.Wadhwa, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure in condoning delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and remanding the matter to the Trial Court. The Court held that the High Court improperly interfered with the Civil Judge's order, which dismissed the application for condonation of delay. The judgment clarified that an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was appropriate for orders related to arbitration awards, establishing that the powers of appellate courts are broader than those under Section 115 CPC.

M/S Essar Constructions vs N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy · Niyam