Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-05-03

District Forest Officer vs R. Rajamanickam And Anr.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2000 SC 526
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
District Forest Officer
Respondent
R. Rajamanickam And Anr.
Author
V.N. Khare
Bench
V.N. Khare, S.N. Phukan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Administrative Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to assess the correctness of charges in a disciplinary inquiry, as established in Union of India v. Upendra Singh. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal can only interfere if no misconduct is made out or if the charges are contrary to law, and it cannot assume the role of the disciplinary authority. Consequently, the Court set aside the Tribunal's order quashing the charges against the respondents, allowing the appeals without costs.

District Forest Officer vs R. Rajamanickam And Anr. · Niyam