Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2000

Supreme Court of India · 2000-03-08

ARIVAZHAGAN vs STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Citation / case number
SC 2000/60231
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARIVAZHAGAN
Respondent
STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Author
M.B. SHAH K.T. THOMAS
Bench
M.B. SHAH K.T. THOMAS

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of a defendant's right to examine witnesses under Section 243(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the limitations a trial court can impose. The Court held that while an accused has the right to present a defense, the trial court has the discretion to limit the number of witnesses to those necessary for the defense, as per Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Court upheld the trial court's decision to restrict the number of witnesses, affirming that the accused could examine a reasonable number rather than an excessive list of 267 witnesses.

ARIVAZHAGAN vs STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE · Niyam