NAR SINGH PAL vs U.O.I.

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the appellant's services as a casual employee by the Telecom Department was punitive in nature, requiring a departmental inquiry under the principles of natural justice. The Court found that the Tribunal's dismissal of the appellant's application was erroneous as it failed to recognize the necessity of an inquiry before termination. The Court set aside the Tribunal's order and reinstated the appellant, emphasizing the importance of due process in employment matters under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution.