KUSH SAHGAL vs M.C.MITTER .

The Supreme Court interpreted the provisions of the United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, specifically Section 3 and Section 7-F, in the context of eviction proceedings initiated by Dr. Kalindi Mitter against Smt. Sushila Saigal. The Court held that the permission granted for eviction must be valid and not set aside by the State Government, emphasizing the necessity of following procedural requirements under the Act. The appeal was allowed, affirming the need for proper legal procedure in eviction cases under the Act.